IRC chat logs for #ltsp on irc.libera.chat (webchat)
Channel log from 25 August 2019 (all times are UTC)
| 00:05 | bluejaypop has left IRC (bluejaypop!~BlueJay@fixed-187-188-168-242.totalplay.net, Ping timeout: 246 seconds) | |
| 00:19 | bluejaypop has joined IRC (bluejaypop!~BlueJay@fixed-187-188-168-242.totalplay.net) | |
| 00:29 | bluejaypop has left IRC (bluejaypop!~BlueJay@fixed-187-188-168-242.totalplay.net, Ping timeout: 244 seconds) | |
| 00:42 | bluejaypop has joined IRC (bluejaypop!~BlueJay@fixed-187-188-168-242.totalplay.net) | |
| 00:55 | bluejaypop has left IRC (bluejaypop!~BlueJay@fixed-187-188-168-242.totalplay.net, Ping timeout: 245 seconds) | |
| 01:05 | pppingme has left IRC (pppingme!~pppingme@unaffiliated/pppingme, Ping timeout: 258 seconds) | |
| 05:19 | pppingme has joined IRC (pppingme!~pppingme@unaffiliated/pppingme) | |
| 06:00 | Hyperbyte has left IRC (Hyperbyte!~jan@middelkoop.cc, Ping timeout: 272 seconds) | |
| 06:07 | ricotz has joined IRC (ricotz!~ricotz@ubuntu/member/ricotz) | |
| 06:18 | Hyperbyte has joined IRC (Hyperbyte!~jan@middelkoop.cc) | |
| 06:23 | vagrantc has left IRC (vagrantc!~vagrant@unaffiliated/vagrantc, Ping timeout: 276 seconds) | |
| 06:26 | ogra has left IRC (ogra!~ogra_@ubuntu/member/ogra, Ping timeout: 244 seconds) | |
| 06:57 | <alkisg> https://github.com/ltsp/ltsp/issues/13 ==> I think it'll be best to disable flow control on all NICs by default, and enable NAT on the 192.168.67.1 subnet, so that both of these issues are solved by default for LTSP installations
| |
| 06:57 | ...anyone thinks that this is a bad idea?
| |
| 07:10 | <Hyperbyte> Don't you run the risk of buffer overflows on smaller switches? Isn't the flow control there to project these switches from having to drop packets?
| |
| 07:12 | If you're asking about my setups directly, I'm pretty sure my managed HP ProCurve won't care. Nor will the Cisco ones. I don't use others for LTSP.
| |
| 07:27 | <alkisg> LTSP is using TCP traffic, so rate limiting will be done at the IP level, not at the ethernet level
| |
| 07:27 | I do not know if AoE would be affected positively or negatively or non at all
| |
| 07:28 | I also don't know of any other big non-IP based traffic and how that would be affected; but I think IP traffic will only be 10 times faster
| |
| 07:28 | Plus, the managed switches that I have, have flow control disabled by default.. yours?
| |
| 08:53 | <Hyperbyte> Probably. Don't know off the top of my head.
| |
| 10:11 | pppingme has left IRC (pppingme!~pppingme@unaffiliated/pppingme, Ping timeout: 258 seconds) | |
| 10:57 | pppingme has joined IRC (pppingme!~pppingme@unaffiliated/pppingme) | |
| 14:31 | vagrantc has joined IRC (vagrantc!~vagrant@unaffiliated/vagrantc) | |
| 15:05 | <mwalters> flow control is disabled by default on my cisco sg300s... same with my netgear gs7
| |
| 15:48 | <alkisg> And I think users will want automatic ip masquerading; how else would the fat clients be able to access the internet...
| |
| 16:20 | bcg has left IRC (bcg!~b@dfx4btyyyyyyyyyyyyyyt-3.rev.dnainternet.fi, Quit: bcg) | |
| 16:24 | bcg has joined IRC (bcg!~b@dfx4btyyyyyyyyyyyyyyt-3.rev.dnainternet.fi) | |
| 17:12 | <mwalters> for dual nic setup?
| |
| 17:12 | most definitely
| |
| 17:12 | anyone who wants a dual nic setup, but not have NAT, would probably know how to configure everything anyways ;)
| |
| 18:52 | ogra_ has joined IRC (ogra_!~ogra_@p5098ed03.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) | |
| 18:52 | ogra_ has left IRC (ogra_!~ogra_@p5098ed03.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) | |
| 18:52 | ogra has joined IRC (ogra!~ogra_@ubuntu/member/ogra) | |
| 20:07 | statler has left IRC (statler!~Georg@p5489731F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de, Remote host closed the connection) | |
| 20:24 | ricotz has left IRC (ricotz!~ricotz@ubuntu/member/ricotz, Quit: Leaving) | |