IRC chat logs for #ltsp on irc.freenode.net (webchat)


Channel log from 8 November 2008   (all times are UTC)

00:00alkisg has joined #ltsp
00:00Ahmuck-Jr has joined #ltsp
00:01
<Ahmuck-Jr>
www.adobe.com is causing a logout and a keyboard lockup
00:01
requiring a hard reboot of the client pc
00:06Ahmuck-Jr has quit IRC
00:49vagrantc has quit IRC
02:00twinprism has quit IRC
02:12Q-FUNK has joined #ltsp
02:39puff has quit IRC
02:42puff has joined #ltsp
03:12puff has quit IRC
03:15puff has joined #ltsp
03:31plamengr has joined #ltsp
03:37Q-FUNK has quit IRC
03:37Q-FUNK1 has joined #ltsp
03:37Q-FUNK1 is now known as Q-FUNK
03:38Q-FUNK has quit IRC
03:38Q-FUNK1 has joined #ltsp
03:38Q-FUNK1 is now known as Q-FUNK
03:38Q-FUNK1 has joined #ltsp
03:39Q-FUNK1 is now known as Q-FUNK
03:39Q-FUNK1 has joined #ltsp
03:39Q-FUNK1 is now known as Q-FUNK
03:39Q-FUNK1 has joined #ltsp
03:39Q-FUNK has joined #ltsp
03:43Q-FUNK has quit IRC
03:56alkisg has quit IRC
04:18alkisg has joined #ltsp
04:31rslrdx has quit IRC
04:32Q-FUNK has joined #ltsp
04:34alkisg has quit IRC
04:51alkisg has joined #ltsp
04:51alekibango has quit IRC
04:56alekibango has joined #ltsp
05:04K_O-Gnom has joined #ltsp
05:18lucascoala has joined #ltsp
06:04nubae has joined #ltsp
06:11cosf has joined #ltsp
06:19Basti_dash has joined #ltsp
06:40alkisg has quit IRC
06:54hanthana has joined #ltsp
06:56Q-FUNK has quit IRC
07:23cliebow has joined #ltsp
07:23
<cliebow>
good MOrning BTS1
07:29cliebow has quit IRC
07:30cliebow has joined #ltsp
07:39Egyptian[Home] has joined #ltsp
07:40Eghie has joined #ltsp
07:48Egyptian[Home]1 has quit IRC
07:53lucascoala has quit IRC
07:57Eghie has quit IRC
08:04jarias has joined #ltsp
08:13hanthana is now known as hanthana|afk
08:17mssmss has joined #ltsp
08:17
<mssmss>
hi
08:18
I recenty installed Edubuntu 8.04.1 for a classroom ltsp setup
08:19
but I can't get more than two clients up at a time ..looks like dhcp freezes
08:19
looks like other users have seen the same issue ...
08:19
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/edubuntu-devel/2008-September/002649.html
08:20
any idea what could be causing this problem ?
08:20
If I turn on multiple clients, not more than two will boot .. others time out at DHCP
08:21
but if I wait until one systems boots to screen, then start the next one, then many clients can come up
08:25
<johnny>
this is not a good time for this channel.. really.
08:26
best are during weekdays..
08:37nd___ has joined #ltsp
08:37
<nd___>
Aloha
08:38
I just need a quick yes/no if possible: When running applications with LTSP they run on the server and I only get the view via X11? Or do they run on the client and performance of applications is manipulated by the power of the client too?
08:38
(Well, so I need two answers... dang)
08:38
<nubae>
nd___: both are possible,
08:38
by default everything runs on the server
08:38
<nd___>
I see
08:39
<nubae>
but we have 2 technologies that allow for local apps, one called, ltsp-localapps
08:39
and the other fatclient
08:39
ltsp-localapps allows u to choose individual apps that run on the client, whereas fatclient makes everything run on the client
08:39
<nd___>
ah, I remember reading that
08:40Ahmuck has joined #ltsp
08:42
<Ahmuck>
i understand i can install a chip on the nic. does the chip have boot rom already on it or does one flash the nic to get the boot rom there?
08:42
<nd___>
thanks nubae
08:43
<Ahmuck>
good morning. i'm looking for "boot rom?". is anyone familiar with this method?
08:43
<nubae>
google is your friend Ahmuck
08:43nd___ has left #ltsp
08:43
<Ahmuck>
did that
08:43
google is a dumb friend at that
08:43
<nubae>
well either u buy a blank rom, or a rom with the data on it
08:44
http://disklessworkstations.com/
08:44
that should make it obvious enough
08:47
<Ahmuck>
k, thx nubae that helps.
08:48
newegg has the entire card for 9.00 and that site has boot roms for 15.00
08:48
go figure
08:48
<rjune__>
it's probably not a great card
08:48
intel cards all do PXE native
08:48
as do quite a few more recent cards
08:48
<nubae>
almost all cards do now, dont they?
08:48
<Ahmuck>
for 8.0 i'd be willing to try
08:49
i'm using older cards, 10/100. the newer cards will do 100/1000
08:50
<rjune__>
even the 10/100 intel cards do pxe
08:51pdjbarber has joined #ltsp
09:04
<Ahmuck>
hi rjune__
09:05
<rjune__>
howdy
09:06Ahmuck has quit IRC
09:06Ahmuck has joined #ltsp
09:07klausade has quit IRC
09:15cyberorg has quit IRC
09:17cosf has quit IRC
09:22Ahmuck has quit IRC
09:23Ahmuck has joined #ltsp
09:33
<johnny>
Ahmuck, many already network boot just fine.
09:38chrisinajar has joined #ltsp
09:46
<Ahmuck>
johnny: with pxe, yes
09:46
mine don't :(
09:47
i do have a bunch od 3c905b-txnnm however
09:48mssmss has left #ltsp
09:49
<Ahmuck>
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833130004
09:55warren_x has joined #ltsp
09:56warren has quit IRC
09:56warren_x is now known as warren
10:02johnny has left #ltsp
10:07joergel has joined #ltsp
10:14Basti_dash has quit IRC
10:21joergel is now known as joecze
10:23joecze has left #ltsp
10:36alkisg has joined #ltsp
10:52jarias has quit IRC
10:57
<sbalneav>
Morning all
11:02hanthana|afk has quit IRC
11:13mistik1_ has joined #ltsp
11:14mistik1 has quit IRC
11:14cliebow_ has joined #ltsp
11:14mistik1_ is now known as mistik1
11:16petre has joined #ltsp
11:28vagrantc has joined #ltsp
11:28
<sbalneav>
vagrantc: Hey hey
11:28
<vagrantc>
hiya
11:28
<sbalneav>
So, which version of Debian does the logout hang with?
11:29
We made a change late yesterday to both ltsp-trunk and ldm-trunk
11:29
we decided to just ditch the "DISP" enviornment variable, and just set DISPLAY properly
11:29
<vagrantc>
sbalneav: i'm guessing it's debian etch, but i've been testing with debian lenny with an older version of openssh-server
11:30
<sbalneav>
Not the version that comes with lenny?
11:30
<vagrantc>
sbalneav: yeah, i always wondered about that DISP thing
11:30
<sbalneav>
Does it work with the ssh version that comes WITH lenny?
11:30
<vagrantc>
sbalneav: nope, the version that comes with lenny seems fine.
11:30
<sbalneav>
Ok
11:30
Now, lenny's the latest stable, right?
11:30
<vagrantc>
not yet
11:30
getting there
11:30
<sbalneav>
ok
11:31
<vagrantc>
etch is current stable, lenny's in a hard freeze
11:31
i don't intend to backport newer ltsp stuff to etch, so it's not a huge deal for me specifically...
11:31
<sbalneav>
I really, REALLY don't want to go back to the kill, since it leaves so many droppings around. So I'd like to figure out why it doesn't work on Etch when all indications are that it should.
11:31
<vagrantc>
but it suggests to me that it might have this issue if folks want to log into older OSes using ldm
11:31
<sbalneav>
Oh, so are we worrying uneccessarily?
11:32
Hm
11:33
<vagrantc>
the whole "ldm can log into any server running ssh" thing
11:33
<sbalneav>
We shouldn't need to do the "kill", it was always such a hack
11:34
<vagrantc>
i'm pretty sure that it has to do with being started using dbus-launch ...
11:34
i think ogra said that ubuntu doesn't use dbus-launch anymore
11:34
but for both icewm and gnome, it uses dbus-launch
11:35
wonder if i can find a window manager that doesn't use dbus-launch to log in
11:35
<sbalneav>
Maybe fedora doesn't either?
11:35
warren: You there?
11:35
Does Fedora use dbus-launch
11:35bjs_redhat has joined #ltsp
11:36
<sbalneav>
Fedora uses dbus-launch, I just checked with Warren
11:36
<vagrantc>
the part that i find *really* strange, is even if i kill *all* running processes of the user, it *still* doesn't log out
11:36
<sbalneav>
Rel 5 does as well
11:36
<warren>
RHEL5
11:37
<sbalneav>
Sorry :)
11:37
<vagrantc>
whereas during the pdx hackfest, killing dbus-launch would actually cause it to finish logging out
11:37
<sbalneav>
Is that after the mods I did yesterday, or just the <> /dev/null patch?
11:38
<vagrantc>
sbalneav: with all the patches applied to current ldm-trunk, and i also tried applying your "2> /dev/null" addition with no luck
11:41
<sbalneav>
Yeah, yesterday I managed to get in proper sigchld handling. It's going to be a bit buggy for sure, and when I get back to winnipeg, they'll be some more patches from that.
11:42
So I'm wondering if that's causing some problems.
11:42
It seems to work here, under Ubuntu and Fedora
11:42
Buth that doesn't mean it doesn't need some more work
11:44* warren tests it on fedora again
11:47
<vagrantc>
sbalneav: oh, looks like i didn't test with your most recent patch to ldm-trunk
11:48
looks like the DISP -> DISPLAY switch, plus a change with handle_entry(GTK_ENTRY(entry), window);
11:48
in the greeter
11:54cliebow_ has quit IRC
12:13
<vagrantc>
ok, build current ldm-trunk still fails with debian lenny using an older version of openssh-server
12:13
fails to log out on the second and subsequent logins
12:13
first goes just fine.
12:15bjs_redhat1 has joined #ltsp
12:15pmatulis_t60 has joined #ltsp
12:17
<vagrantc>
in the logs, i see "ending ssh session" and "shutting down ssh session", the socket is still open (note: it seems to be missing the vtNN part)
12:18
/var/run/ldm_socket__192.168.0.1
12:20bjs_redhat has quit IRC
12:23davidj has joined #ltsp
12:23
<davidj>
sbalneav: Ping?
12:24
<rjune__>
davidj: howdy
12:39
<vagrantc>
hrm.
12:40
now ldm is hanging on logout with newer versions of openssh ...
12:44
yes, now it is consistantly hanging for me.
12:47
<sbalneav>
vagrantc: do you see the ttyname call in the code?
12:50
<vagrantc>
sbalneav: i see some code mentioning ttyname
12:50
what's this about: ldm.vty = ttyname + 5;
12:51
<sbalneav>
Well, ttyname returns a "/dev/ttyxxxx" name
12:51
<vagrantc>
ah, i see a FIXME around it too
12:51
<sbalneav>
Yeah, we should be doing that a little better
12:52
so ttyname_r isn't returning a ttyname?
12:52
<vagrantc>
well, ldm.vty doesn't contain anything when it creates the socket ...
12:52
<sbalneav>
hm
12:53
ok, lemme add some code to parse the string a little more intelligently
12:53
one sec
12:54
<vagrantc>
i've gotta eat and then run to work soon ...
12:58GodFather has joined #ltsp
12:58warren has quit IRC
12:59pmatulis_t60 has quit IRC
13:00
<sbalneav>
vagrantc: ok, check out r939
13:01
lets at least see if it gives you an error message now
13:20alkisg1 has joined #ltsp
13:20alkisg has quit IRC
13:20alkisg1 is now known as alkisg
13:31Q-FUNK has joined #ltsp
13:32
<vagrantc>
sbalneav: well, interesting ...
13:32
sbalneav: that worked fine the first login, as usual, but when ldm respawned, it kept spitting out error messages ...
13:33
sbalneav: "couldn't determine the tty name"
13:45Basti_dash has joined #ltsp
14:12GodFather has quit IRC
14:16cliebow_ has joined #ltsp
14:16Basti_dash has quit IRC
14:17vagrantc has quit IRC
14:25
<sbalneav>
ls
14:47cliebow__ has joined #ltsp
14:52alkisg has quit IRC
14:55vagrantc has joined #ltsp
15:05cliebow has left #ltsp
15:21johnny has joined #ltsp
15:22
<johnny>
hello warren_
15:26
<chrisinajar>
He is the afk.
15:35
<Ahmuck>
iv'e got a number of thin clients that fail to boot to a login screen. here is the error and the specs. should i be filing a bug?
15:35
Disconecting: que, disconnect, sock, done
15:36
[36.883906] hbd0: Recieve control failed (result -32)
15:36
before the Disconec... line, is this line Setting up LTSP client ...
15:37
the mobo is an AOpen AX6BC with a AOpen PG80/DVD video card an either a Acer G722 or a AOC 7Gir monitor
15:38
a number of them fail with the above error messages one simply fails with many messages so is suspect something odd is going on with the hardware in it, however as all the others are failing with the same error i suspect it's unsupported hardware ?
15:38
these are 450mhz, 256mb, and 8 or 16 mb video clients
15:40
i need to step out for the afternoon, as i'm exhausted trying to get this solution to work. msg me if you have any idea what it might be. i'm using ubuntu ltsp server installation, and i'll not cross post. if i there is no reply, i'm going to file a bug in both bug lists. i would have suspected this hardware was supported as a thin client
15:41
<vagrantc>
doesn't sound like a hardware problem to me.
15:41
un
15:41
[13:40] [vagrantc(+ei)] [3:#ltsp(+cnt)] [Act: 9]
15:41
[13:40] [vagrantc(+ei)] [3:#ltsp(+cnt)] [Act: 9] [#ltsp]
15:41
oops
15:41
Ahmuck: unless it didn't detect your network card
15:42
<Ahmuck>
vagrantc: it detects it, as i've been using these cards in other machines and ltsp on them to verify they work
15:42
one other note, if i put a 4.x G hard drive in and install xubuntu they work fine.
15:43
albeit in low graphics mode
15:43
<vagrantc>
but does the version of ltsp you're currently using detect the network card?
15:46
<Ahmuck>
wouldn't it if the network card works with ltsp in another machine?
15:49
vagrantc: i'm confused a bit. if the network card is recognized in one machine, wouldn't it be recognized in this machine as well ?
15:49
it's a pxe 3com card and it boots a ltsp client in another machine
15:49Q-FUNK has quit IRC
15:50
<vagrantc>
probably would be.
15:50
but it's not impossible for machines that seem identical to contain different parts on the inside.
15:50
<Ahmuck>
they are identical. i put them togather this afternoon
15:50
<vagrantc>
though i *think* you'd get a different error message
15:51
<Ahmuck>
i'll try a different video card when i get back next week and see if that is the problem
15:51alkisg has joined #ltsp
15:51
<Ahmuck>
on a nother note, we have a number of imac's osx 9.2 and i assume we can use those as well?
15:51
<vagrantc>
ah, it's already booted to the root filesystem ...
15:51
<johnny>
it's more complicated ..
15:51
<vagrantc>
and running the init scripts
15:52
<johnny>
you have to build the chroot on the imacs
15:52
and then copy it to your server
15:53
<vagrantc>
Ahmuck: sounds more like nbd is dying part way through the boot process ...
15:53
<Ahmuck>
nbd?
15:53
network boot dameon ?
15:53
anywho, i've not got the server ordered yet, thankfully, as i was hoping to use the older hardware, but may need to consider something else
15:55
<vagrantc>
network block device
15:55
it's one of the more recent ways ltsp mounts it's root filesystem over the network
15:56
<Ahmuck>
arg, i'll stay. i'm going to cancel my afternoon
15:56
and try to de-bug this
16:00
<alkisg>
vagrantc, there are some new strings in ldm (untranslated), how are translation-updates handled? I just generate a new ldm.po and send it to you? :)
16:03
<Ahmuck>
k, swapped video card. it's the board
16:04
it appears that board is not compatible with ltsp though it does work for xubuntu
16:04
evne with a new video card, the error is the same
16:04
i'll post it as a bug for non-compatible hardware
16:06warren has joined #ltsp
16:07
<Ahmuck>
before i do, i'm going to pull both video cards and try them in a good machine i know that boots to ltsp client to verify it's not the video cards
16:09
<vagrantc>
alkisg: translation updates haven't been handled much at all lately :)
16:09
<alkisg>
vagrantc, should I send you an updated version, or just wait for the new version you're all preparing?
16:09
<vagrantc>
alkisg: not sure ...
16:10
alkisg: might want to wait a bit, as there may be some significant changes in the near future ... so strings may change.
16:11
<alkisg>
vagrantc, ok, I'll stay tuned! :)
16:13
<vagrantc>
alkisg: i've been meaning to take a look at making calls for translations soonish
16:22
<alkisg>
vagrantc, general question about translations: I've seen a nice interface for translations in translations.launchpad.net (is that rosetta?). It's very easy for the translators, because it also proposes translations from other packages. How easy or hard would it be for the developers of some application to use that? (or, if there are any other reasons not to use it...)
16:26plamengr has quit IRC
16:30
<vagrantc>
alkisg: difficult.
16:30
<alkisg>
vagrantc, ok, ty
16:31
<vagrantc>
alkisg: at least, it's a closed project, and the debian translation teams have really found the translations recieved by way of rosetta to be of varying quality- often very disconnected and disjointed.
16:31
alkisg: very inconsistant translations, etc.
16:32
alkisg: but i haven't used it directly, merely heard word from various teams that have been working on translation projects in debian for years...
16:33
<alkisg>
vagrantc: I see... I've had a long talk with others about the translation quality vs translation quantity, and I thought "well, better to have not-so-good translations than no translations at all", but I see the point here
16:33otavio has quit IRC
16:34
<alkisg>
It must become an open project first, and easy for the developers, and maybe with a ranking system for the translators, so that the developers would be able to estimate the quality...
16:35
...and "better" translators would be able to override "worse" translations... well, somethink like this would take time, I guess
16:40johnny has left #ltsp
16:44
<vagrantc>
alkisg: it mainly seems to need to require an overall process for making consistant translations for a given application, and a good review process, most likely.
16:44loather has joined #ltsp
16:49
<sbalneav>
vagrantc: Can you try 940?
16:49
Just pushed it.
16:50
As a further test:
16:50
disable localdevs, here's why:
16:50
We're <> /dev/null the Xsession, but NOT the ltspfsmounter remove all
16:50
<vagrantc>
i've actually been testing with localdev, local_app and sound disabled.
16:51
<sbalneav>
Hm, that was my other thought, that maybe ssh was waiting for output from ltspfsmounter
16:51
ok, then try enabling them :)
16:51
<vagrantc>
well, i've tested with them enabled as well.
16:51
i've been trying with all possible combinations :)
16:52
<sbalneav>
ok
16:52jammcq has joined #ltsp
16:52
<sbalneav>
Try 940, see if that makes any difference
16:52
<vagrantc>
though i've erred on the side of disabling stuff mostly, trying to get to the root cuase.
16:52
<jammcq>
Scotty !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
16:52
<sbalneav>
jammq!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
16:52
<vagrantc>
sbalneav: i'll see if i can wrangle some time to do so
16:53
<sbalneav>
I'll set up a lenny box when I get home.
16:53
<vagrantc>
sbalneav: could you cut-and paste your commit messages for your merge commit messages?
16:53johnny has joined #ltsp
16:54
<vagrantc>
sbalneav: would be helpful :)
16:54
<sbalneav>
bzr log in trunk shows my local tree log messages
16:54
why should I duplucate?
16:54
<vagrantc>
bzr log -r -1
16:54
940 Scott Balneaves 2008-11-08 [merge]
16:54
Merged from Scott's tree
16:54
<sbalneav>
right
16:54
<vagrantc>
that's what i see
16:55
<sbalneav>
in mine, I see:
16:55
<vagrantc>
so i have to specify --long
16:55
to see the actual commit messages
16:55
<sbalneav>
..........and?
16:56
Then if someone specifies --long, they're going to get duped messages
16:56
that seems not right
16:58
<vagrantc>
well, bzr tells me it's a merge and from where, so it's not right either to specify that in the commit message.
16:58
if redundancy of information is your primary concern.
16:58
it was just a small request, take it or leave it as you please.
16:59
alternately, briefly summarize what the merged commits contain
17:00
<sbalneav>
No, I'm fine with doing it, it's just that it seems redundant
17:01
<vagrantc>
both ways carry redundancy
17:01
<sbalneav>
ok, no problem
17:02
We were only using the vt tag in the control socket as a differentiator between multiple ldm instances running on the same thin client
17:03
so I just ditched the ttyname_r and per stgraber's suggestion, just using getpid()
17:03
so that should solve the whacky
17:03
control socket name problem
17:04
when I get home, I'll put together a Lenny box, and try to track down the ssh problem
17:04
now, does debian still use nfs + bindmount only, i.e. is the overlay mount in the kernel still broken?
17:05
<vagrantc>
default is nfs + bindmounts, yes.
17:05
there's options to use NBD and such
17:08
<sbalneav>
Does that work now? I remember Debian used to have a problem with either the ramfs, or the mounting of the ramfs over the nfs
17:09
it'd REALLY be sweet if we ditched the bindmounts, and could just get the ramfs mounting over either nfs or nbd
17:10
For me, anyway, the ram overlying the nfs would be really nice.
17:10
<vagrantc>
i've heard people have sucess with it using aufs
17:10
aufs with tmpfs/NFS overlays
17:11
<sbalneav>
vagrantc: Oh, also, I'm going to add a trap handler to the ldm screen script so that killing the screen script cleans up the XAUTHORITY file.
17:11
You'll see that pushed soon
17:11
<vagrantc>
i haven't tried it in a while, but NBD+aufs+squashfs worked fine.
17:11
<sbalneav>
Oh, cool.
17:11
We should look at ditching the bindmounts then, at some point.
17:12
<vagrantc>
i've also done NBD+ext2+bindmounts, which was nice.
17:12
allowed for updating the chroot without rebuilding it
17:12
<sbalneav>
ah, yeah
17:12
that'd be good too.
17:12
<vagrantc>
NBD+aufs+ext2+tmpfs would probably also work.
17:13
<sbalneav>
we're just about to have dinner here, I'll be afk for a bit.
17:13
then I'll get the trap handler in.
17:39alkisg has left #ltsp
17:53
<vagrantc>
sbalneav: 940 hung initiating the second login attempt
17:53
i'm supicious of the XAUTHORITY changes in that one.
17:53
i seem to recall having issues with XAUTHORITY needing to only be set when LDM_DIRECTX=true
18:00
seems like the XAUTHORITY file isn't being created
18:01
ah, it's only created ONCE in the screen script, but then deletes it somewhere else...
18:06K_O-Gnom has quit IRC
18:09johnny has left #ltsp
18:17captain_magnus has quit IRC
18:26captain_magnus has joined #ltsp
18:28killsalad has joined #ltsp
18:30
<killsalad>
hi all - how can I use terminal's local hard drive, somebody told me that local /tmp would help performance?
18:51Gadi has joined #ltsp
18:58petre has quit IRC
18:58nubae has quit IRC
18:58jc2it has quit IRC
18:58rcy`` has quit IRC
18:58daduke_ has quit IRC
18:58Hyperbyte has quit IRC
18:58jbrett has quit IRC
18:58artista_frustrad has quit IRC
19:01gentgeen__ has quit IRC
19:03gentgeen__ has joined #ltsp
19:03petre has joined #ltsp
19:03nubae has joined #ltsp
19:03jc2it has joined #ltsp
19:03rcy`` has joined #ltsp
19:03artista_frustrad has joined #ltsp
19:03Hyperbyte has joined #ltsp
19:03daduke_ has joined #ltsp
19:03jbrett has joined #ltsp
19:08gonzaloaf_laptop has joined #ltsp
19:13phantom has quit IRC
19:13F-GT has joined #ltsp
19:50Ahmuck has quit IRC
19:58nubae has quit IRC
20:03japerry has joined #ltsp
20:09daduke_ has quit IRC
20:09Hyperbyte has quit IRC
20:09jc2it has quit IRC
20:09petre has quit IRC
20:09jbrett has quit IRC
20:09artista_frustrad has quit IRC
20:09rcy`` has quit IRC
20:10petre has joined #ltsp
20:10jc2it has joined #ltsp
20:10rcy`` has joined #ltsp
20:10artista_frustrad has joined #ltsp
20:10Hyperbyte has joined #ltsp
20:10daduke_ has joined #ltsp
20:10jbrett has joined #ltsp
20:18Ahmuck has joined #ltsp
20:25warren has quit IRC
20:37warren has joined #ltsp
20:37
<warren>
Gadi, sbalneav: If you have any good photos of the group I could use for my blog, please let me know.
20:49Ahmuck has quit IRC
20:50cliebow_ has quit IRC
20:52daduke_ has quit IRC
20:52Hyperbyte has quit IRC
20:52jc2it has quit IRC
20:52petre has quit IRC
20:52jbrett has quit IRC
20:52artista_frustrad has quit IRC
20:52rcy`` has quit IRC
20:57petre has joined #ltsp
20:57jc2it has joined #ltsp
20:57rcy`` has joined #ltsp
20:57artista_frustrad has joined #ltsp
20:57Hyperbyte has joined #ltsp
20:57daduke_ has joined #ltsp
20:57jbrett has joined #ltsp
21:05vagrantc has quit IRC
21:13cliebow__ has quit IRC
21:18davidj has quit IRC
21:22vagrantc has joined #ltsp
21:24
<Gadi>
howdy, vagrantc
21:27jammcq has quit IRC
21:27bjs_redhat1 has quit IRC
21:31* vagrantc looks at all the pushes today
21:32
<Gadi>
hehe
21:32
good to doublecheck them - folks here have been drinkin
21:33
brb
21:37
<vagrantc>
Gadi: mostly, it's my usual nitpicking :)
21:38
localapps menu stuff, though .. wheee
21:39petre has quit IRC
21:49
<warren>
vagrantc: Gadi: any idea what version of GNOME that will work with?
21:49
KDE too?
21:56
<vagrantc>
warren: i have no confirmation that it works at all :)
21:57
nor have i even tried it
22:02CaScAdE^1arAway has joined #ltsp
22:09CaScAdE^FarAway has quit IRC
22:16johnny has joined #ltsp
22:21Ahmuck has joined #ltsp
22:38hanthana has joined #ltsp
22:39vagrantc has quit IRC
22:59Gadi has quit IRC
23:10hanthana has quit IRC
23:15dtrask has joined #ltsp
23:15dtrask has joined #ltsp
23:23Ahmuck has quit IRC
23:29
<johnny>
yum is really annoying on missing repositories..
23:31Ahmuck has joined #ltsp
23:38alkisg has joined #ltsp
23:40
<Ryan52>
johnny: how many distros do you use? :)
23:45
<johnny>
on which computers? :)
23:45
web developers tend to work with alot of different OS
23:45
or rather.. alot of different distros
23:45chrisinajar has quit IRC
23:46
<johnny>
some servers are debian, some centos, some rhel, some ubuntu, some gentoo
23:46
on the desktop tho.. ubuntu, gentoo, and now fedora.. so i could understand rhel stuff better
23:47
<Ryan52>
that would confuse me way too much.
23:47
<johnny>
being a web developer is uber complicated..
23:48
the amount of variables that are completely out of your control is unumerable..
23:49Ahmuck has quit IRC
23:52Ahmuck has joined #ltsp
23:52
<johnny>
Ryan52, you should be lucky any web pages you look at even work :)
23:53
<Ryan52>
some even tell me they work! http://ryan52.info/ :D
23:53
<johnny>
hehe
23:54
to be a web developer.. you really have to understand the plumbing of the internet...
23:54
altho.. mail is often the most complicated..
23:55
i don't own a mac or any win boxes .. that's given me more brain power :)
23:56
i probably should be more proficient at bsd in general tho..